The Theories and Practices of Trademark Genericism


The Theories and Practices of Trademark Genericism
Cheng-Chiou Teng
genericism, distinctiveness, the minds of the consuming public, primary significance test, cancellation of the trademark
A basic function of trademarks is to identify the source of a product. In order
to carry out this function, it is necessary to design a trademark with distinctiveness.
A trademark without distinctiveness can not be registered with the Patent and
Trademark Office or serve as a basis for claiming trademark rights because it lacks
the function of source identification.
Trademark genericism, also known as genericide, genericness and generalization,
is the rule which governs the loss of trademark protection of a registered
trademark that was once distinctive and often well known, but fell into the public
domain and became a generic name owing to the change in the perception of the
consuming public.
Genericism in U.S. court practices is not a new concept but is just beginning
to appear in Taiwanese Trademark Law when the latest amendment went in effect
on 28/11/2003. Considering the fact that this topic is rarely addressed among Taiwan
academics or practitioners, this article examines the American legal system
and courts practices and attempts to interpret the current Taiwan Trademark Law in
order to find the meaning of genericism, causes of genericism, criteria for judging genericism and the legal effect of post-genericism. In addition, this paper strives to
provide solutions to new problems caused by trademark genericism.
Abstract Article



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *