[{"subject":"論「性別差異」對醫療行為及病人同意的影響","dataClassName":null,"pubUnitName":"科技法律研究所","posterDate":null,"updateDate":null,"detailContent":"<span style=\"font-size:115%;\"><strong>論「性別差異」對醫療行為及病人同意的影響</strong></span><br />\r\n作者：王志嘉&nbsp;(Chih-Chia Wang)、羅慶徽<br />\r\n出版年月：200910<br />\r\n關鍵詞：性別差異、性別意識、病人自我決定權、告知後同意、醫療糾紛、Gender Differences、Gender Sensitivity、Patient Autonomy、Informed Consent、Medical Dispute<br />\r\n&nbsp;","summary":"","liaisonper":null,"liaisontel":null,"liaisonfax":null,"liaisonemail":null,"docs":[{"fileurl":"https://lawreview.law.nycu.edu.tw/lawreviewlaw/ch/app/data/doc?module=nycu0001&detailNo=1400166718713630720&type=s","pdffileurl":"","odffileurl":"","expFile":"論「性別差異」對醫療行為及病人同意的影響"}],"images":[],"videos":[],"audios":[],"resources":[]},{"subject":"「胚胎植入前基因診斷」之憲法問題","dataClassName":null,"pubUnitName":"科技法律研究所","posterDate":null,"updateDate":null,"detailContent":"<span style=\"font-size:115%;\"><strong>「胚胎植入前基因診斷」之憲法問</strong></span>題<br />\r\n作者：陳仲妮<br />\r\n出版年月：200910<br />\r\n關鍵詞：胚胎植入前基因診斷、救命寶寶、體外胚胎、人性尊嚴、生命權、生育自決權、優生學、扮演上帝、Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis(PGD)、Rescue Baby、Embryos in Vitro、Human Dignity、Right to Life、Right to Control Conception、Eugenics、Playing God<br />\r\n&nbsp;","summary":"","liaisonper":null,"liaisontel":null,"liaisonfax":null,"liaisonemail":null,"docs":[{"fileurl":"https://lawreview.law.nycu.edu.tw/lawreviewlaw/ch/app/data/doc?module=nycu0001&detailNo=1400166203657293824&type=s","pdffileurl":"","odffileurl":"","expFile":"「胚胎植入前基因診斷」之憲法問題"}],"images":[],"videos":[],"audios":[],"resources":[]},{"subject":"論健康保險之保前疾病、追溯保險與被保險人之善意--相關實務見解綜合評析","dataClassName":null,"pubUnitName":"科技法律研究所","posterDate":null,"updateDate":null,"detailContent":"<span style=\"font-size:115%;\"><strong>論健康保險之保前疾病、追溯保險與被保險人之善意--相關實務見解綜合評析</strong></span><br />\r\n作者：葉啓洲&nbsp;(Chi-Chou Yeh)<br />\r\n出版年月：200910<br />\r\n關鍵詞：健康保險、保前疾病、被保險人之善意、先天性疾病、追溯保險、對價平衡原則、等待期間、Health Insurance、Pre-Existing Condition、Good Faith、Congenital Disorder、Retrospective Insurance、Principle of Equivalence、Pre-Existing Exclusion Period<br />\r\n&nbsp;","summary":"","liaisonper":null,"liaisontel":null,"liaisonfax":null,"liaisonemail":null,"docs":[{"fileurl":"https://lawreview.law.nycu.edu.tw/lawreviewlaw/ch/app/data/doc?module=nycu0001&detailNo=1400165920743100416&type=s","pdffileurl":"","odffileurl":"","expFile":"論健康保險之保前疾病、追溯保險與被保險人之善意--相關實務見解綜合評析"}],"images":[],"videos":[],"audios":[],"resources":[]},{"subject":"網路世界中關鍵字所涉及之商標侵權爭議--以美國法的初始興趣混淆原則與使用為中心","dataClassName":null,"pubUnitName":"科技法律研究所","posterDate":null,"updateDate":null,"detailContent":"<span style=\"font-size:115%;\"><strong>網路世界中關鍵字所涉及之商標侵權爭議--以美國法的初始興趣混淆原則與使用為中心</strong></span><br />\r\n作者：簡維克<br />\r\n出版年月：200910<br />\r\n關鍵詞：初始興趣混淆、關鍵字、商標法、搜尋引擎、Initial Interest Confusion、Keyword、Search Engine、Google<br />\r\n&nbsp;","summary":"","liaisonper":null,"liaisontel":null,"liaisonfax":null,"liaisonemail":null,"docs":[{"fileurl":"https://lawreview.law.nycu.edu.tw/lawreviewlaw/ch/app/data/doc?module=nycu0001&detailNo=1400165536192532480&type=s","pdffileurl":"","odffileurl":"","expFile":"網路世界中關鍵字所涉及之商標侵權爭議--以美國法的初始興趣混淆原則與使用為中心"}],"images":[],"videos":[],"audios":[],"resources":[]},{"subject":"智慧財產案件有效性判斷爭議--以美國法「爭點排除」為主","dataClassName":null,"pubUnitName":"科技法律研究所","posterDate":null,"updateDate":null,"detailContent":"<span style=\"font-size:115%;\"><strong>智慧財產案件有效性判斷爭議--以美國法「爭點排除」為主</strong></span><br />\r\n作者：陳國成<br />\r\n出版年月：200910<br />\r\n關鍵詞：智慧財產案件審理法、智慧財產權有效性、爭點排除(爭點效)、請求排除、Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act、Validity of Intellectual Property Right、Issue Preclusion、Claim Preclusion<br />\r\n&nbsp;","summary":"","liaisonper":null,"liaisontel":null,"liaisonfax":null,"liaisonemail":null,"docs":[{"fileurl":"https://lawreview.law.nycu.edu.tw/lawreviewlaw/ch/app/data/doc?module=nycu0001&detailNo=1400165088056315904&type=s","pdffileurl":"","odffileurl":"","expFile":"智慧財產案件有效性判斷爭議--以美國法「爭點排除」為主"}],"images":[],"videos":[],"audios":[],"resources":[]},{"subject":"思想與表達之區別、合併及電腦程式侵權判斷之步驟--最高法院94年度臺上字第1530號刑事判決評析","dataClassName":null,"pubUnitName":"科技法律研究所","posterDate":null,"updateDate":null,"detailContent":"思想與表達之區別、合併及電腦程式侵權判斷之步驟--最高法院94年度臺上字第1530號刑事判決評析<br />\r\n作者：羅明通<br />\r\n出版年月：200910<br />\r\n關鍵詞：Whelan 案、Lotus 案、Altai 案、SSO、結構次序組織、思想與表達、解構過濾抽離、三步驟測試法、非文字成分、Whelan、Lotus、Altai、SSO、Structure-Sequence-Organization、Idea and Expression、Dissection-Filtering-Abstraction、Three-Part Test、Three-Pronged Test、Non-Literal Elements<br />\r\n&nbsp;","summary":"","liaisonper":null,"liaisontel":null,"liaisonfax":null,"liaisonemail":null,"docs":[{"fileurl":"https://lawreview.law.nycu.edu.tw/lawreviewlaw/ch/app/data/doc?module=nycu0001&detailNo=1400164528041234432&type=s","pdffileurl":"","odffileurl":"","expFile":"思想與表達之區別、合併及電腦程式侵權判斷之步驟--最高法院94年度臺上字第1530號刑事判決評析"}],"images":[],"videos":[],"audios":[],"resources":[]}]